<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 616 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419578</link>
    <description>The ITAT Delhi upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) decision to allow the claim of deduction under section 80IC of the Income Tax Act for the Assessment Year 2013-14. The dispute revolved around whether the activities of the assessee constituted manufacturing or job work. The ITAT Delhi, following precedent and consistency in decisions, ruled in favor of the assessee, emphasizing that the transformation of raw materials into saleable items fell within the ambit of manufacturing. The case underscored the importance of maintaining consistency in decisions across assessment years, upholding the claim of deduction based on previous rulings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2022 17:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=672929" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 616 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419578</link>
      <description>The ITAT Delhi upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) decision to allow the claim of deduction under section 80IC of the Income Tax Act for the Assessment Year 2013-14. The dispute revolved around whether the activities of the assessee constituted manufacturing or job work. The ITAT Delhi, following precedent and consistency in decisions, ruled in favor of the assessee, emphasizing that the transformation of raw materials into saleable items fell within the ambit of manufacturing. The case underscored the importance of maintaining consistency in decisions across assessment years, upholding the claim of deduction based on previous rulings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419578</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>