<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 614 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419576</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, directing the deletion of the disallowance of delayed deposit of employees&#039; share of ESI/PF under section 36(1)(va) of the IT Act. The Tribunal held that the amendment introduced by the Finance Act 2021 did not apply to the relevant assessment year and favored the appellant based on conflicting judicial decisions. Additionally, the Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s claim for the deduction of Education Cess, resulting in the appeal being allowed in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2022 18:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=672927" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 614 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419576</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, directing the deletion of the disallowance of delayed deposit of employees&#039; share of ESI/PF under section 36(1)(va) of the IT Act. The Tribunal held that the amendment introduced by the Finance Act 2021 did not apply to the relevant assessment year and favored the appellant based on conflicting judicial decisions. Additionally, the Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s claim for the deduction of Education Cess, resulting in the appeal being allowed in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419576</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>