<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 610 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419572</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeals of the assessee, deleting the disallowances made by the AO and sustained by the CIT(A) on account of late deposit of ESI and PF contributions. The tribunal held that contributions made before the due date of filing the return under Section 139(1) should not be disallowed and that the explanation to Section 36(1)(va) inserted by the Finance Act, 2021, was not retrospective.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2022 08:26:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=672923" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 610 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419572</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeals of the assessee, deleting the disallowances made by the AO and sustained by the CIT(A) on account of late deposit of ESI and PF contributions. The tribunal held that contributions made before the due date of filing the return under Section 139(1) should not be disallowed and that the explanation to Section 36(1)(va) inserted by the Finance Act, 2021, was not retrospective.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419572</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>