<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 604 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419566</link>
    <description>Essential electricity supply for a corporate debtor in CIRP may be restored or continued during moratorium where the supply is needed to preserve the debtor as a going concern, and pre-CIRP disconnection does not by itself bar protection under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. Past dues arising before insolvency are to be treated as creditor claims within the resolution process, so they cannot be demanded upfront as a condition for reconnection. A fresh security deposit for pre-insolvency liabilities was likewise not justified where the supply was required for the resolution effort. The direction restoring power supply was maintained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2022 08:26:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=672917" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 604 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419566</link>
      <description>Essential electricity supply for a corporate debtor in CIRP may be restored or continued during moratorium where the supply is needed to preserve the debtor as a going concern, and pre-CIRP disconnection does not by itself bar protection under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. Past dues arising before insolvency are to be treated as creditor claims within the resolution process, so they cannot be demanded upfront as a condition for reconnection. A fresh security deposit for pre-insolvency liabilities was likewise not justified where the supply was required for the resolution effort. The direction restoring power supply was maintained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419566</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>