<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 599 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , NEW DELHI BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419561</link>
    <description>In personal guarantor insolvency proceedings, service of the Section 95 application in Form C was treated as sufficient limited notice at the pre-Resolution Professional stage to secure appearance and inform the interim moratorium. The Tribunal held that no separate notice of listing was required before appointment of the Resolution Professional, because the statutory scheme does not contemplate adjudication on merits or a hearing to the debtor at that stage. Preliminary objections and challenges to maintainability are to be raised after the Resolution Professional&#039;s report, at the Section 100 stage. The recall application was therefore rejected as premature, and objections sought to be raised immediately were not entertained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2022 12:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=672912" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 599 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , NEW DELHI BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419561</link>
      <description>In personal guarantor insolvency proceedings, service of the Section 95 application in Form C was treated as sufficient limited notice at the pre-Resolution Professional stage to secure appearance and inform the interim moratorium. The Tribunal held that no separate notice of listing was required before appointment of the Resolution Professional, because the statutory scheme does not contemplate adjudication on merits or a hearing to the debtor at that stage. Preliminary objections and challenges to maintainability are to be raised after the Resolution Professional&#039;s report, at the Section 100 stage. The recall application was therefore rejected as premature, and objections sought to be raised immediately were not entertained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419561</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>