<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (7) TMI 24 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28293</link>
    <description>The High Court of BOMBAY held that the cotton bales pledged by the assessee represented its income assessable under section 69 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Court rejected the assessee&#039;s claims regarding ownership of the goods and upheld the addition of the value of the excess stock to the assessee&#039;s income. The Court found no basis to conclude that the assessee&#039;s explanation was true and dismissed allegations of the decision being based on suspicion. The assessee was directed to pay the costs of the reference to the Commissioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 12:09:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=67291" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (7) TMI 24 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28293</link>
      <description>The High Court of BOMBAY held that the cotton bales pledged by the assessee represented its income assessable under section 69 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Court rejected the assessee&#039;s claims regarding ownership of the goods and upheld the addition of the value of the excess stock to the assessee&#039;s income. The Court found no basis to conclude that the assessee&#039;s explanation was true and dismissed allegations of the decision being based on suspicion. The assessee was directed to pay the costs of the reference to the Commissioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28293</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>