https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419557 The Tribunal deemed the demand notice validly served at the Corporate Debtor's registered office. The absence of specific authorization to initiate CIRP was cured by subsequent ratification. Sufficient proof of debt and default was found despite document annexation issues. No pre-existing dispute was established before the demand notice. Mr. Immaneni Eswara Rao was appointed as the IRP. The Company Petition was admitted, initiating CIRP with a declared moratorium, emphasizing cooperation and compliance with the order. en-us Thu, 24 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 15 Mar 2022 08:26:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419557 The Tribunal deemed the demand notice validly served at the Corporate Debtor's registered office. The absence of specific authorization to initiate CIRP was cured by subsequent ratification. Sufficient proof of debt and default was found despite document annexation issues. No pre-existing dispute was established before the demand notice. Mr. Immaneni Eswara Rao was appointed as the IRP. The Company Petition was admitted, initiating CIRP with a declared moratorium, emphasizing cooperation and compliance with the order. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Thu, 24 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419557