https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419546 Appellate interference was refused because the single judge had not granted waiver of the amount claimed for non-submission of C forms; the order only set aside the recovery notice and directed consideration of the respondent's representation. The authority was merely required to examine the waiver request in accordance with the BIFR scheme. As no final or positive direction had been issued, there was no basis to disturb the order. Any adverse decision on the representation would remain open to challenge in the manner known to law. en-us Fri, 25 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 15 Mar 2022 08:25:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419546 Appellate interference was refused because the single judge had not granted waiver of the amount claimed for non-submission of C forms; the order only set aside the recovery notice and directed consideration of the respondent's representation. The authority was merely required to examine the waiver request in accordance with the BIFR scheme. As no final or positive direction had been issued, there was no basis to disturb the order. Any adverse decision on the representation would remain open to challenge in the manner known to law. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Fri, 25 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419546