<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 1954 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301140</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed, setting aside the impugned order for the recovery of CENVAT credit. The Tribunal emphasized that the eligibility for credit arises upon the payment of duty in the manufacturing process, following the precedent set by a similar case. It was clarified that if duty liability is discharged by the supplier and reflected in the invoice, the appellant is entitled to claim the credit, regardless of whether certain charges are included in the assessable value.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2022 08:24:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=672891" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 1954 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301140</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed, setting aside the impugned order for the recovery of CENVAT credit. The Tribunal emphasized that the eligibility for credit arises upon the payment of duty in the manufacturing process, following the precedent set by a similar case. It was clarified that if duty liability is discharged by the supplier and reflected in the invoice, the appellant is entitled to claim the credit, regardless of whether certain charges are included in the assessable value.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301140</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>