https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301157 Section 160 CrPC was construed as territorially limited to persons within the officer's own station or an adjoining station, and not as conferring an all-India power to require attendance; on that basis, the challenge to notices issued outside the permitted local limits was found prima facie well founded. The writ petition was treated as maintainable because the affected natural persons were also petitioners, and territorial jurisdiction was held to exist since the notices were served on persons in Delhi and part of the cause of action arose there. Interim protection was granted, and operation of the notices was stayed pending further hearing. en-us Tue, 07 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 15 Mar 2022 08:24:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301157 Section 160 CrPC was construed as territorially limited to persons within the officer's own station or an adjoining station, and not as conferring an all-India power to require attendance; on that basis, the challenge to notices issued outside the permitted local limits was found prima facie well founded. The writ petition was treated as maintainable because the affected natural persons were also petitioners, and territorial jurisdiction was held to exist since the notices were served on persons in Delhi and part of the cause of action arose there. Interim protection was granted, and operation of the notices was stayed pending further hearing. Case-Laws Money Laundering Tue, 07 Dec 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301157