https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301137 A letter forming part of a broader settlement communication may be admissible to prove a family settlement, even if it contains admissions, where it is read as an ordinary course communication and not as a mere self-serving recital. The court also upheld admission of supporting correspondence to show that similar letters did not necessarily bear the disputed seal, finding no prejudice from the additional documents and no basis to exclude them. The evidentiary objections therefore failed, and the family settlement was treated as proved. en-us Fri, 28 Aug 1936 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 14 Mar 2022 16:59:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301137 A letter forming part of a broader settlement communication may be admissible to prove a family settlement, even if it contains admissions, where it is read as an ordinary course communication and not as a mere self-serving recital. The court also upheld admission of supporting correspondence to show that similar letters did not necessarily bear the disputed seal, finding no prejudice from the additional documents and no basis to exclude them. The evidentiary objections therefore failed, and the family settlement was treated as proved. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 28 Aug 1936 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301137