<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Expenditure Disallowance Overturned Due to Non-Deduction of TDS; Assessee Wins u/s 40(a)(ia) Proviso.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=62429</link>
    <description>Disallowance of expenditure incurred on account of LFR - Non deduction of TDS - Disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) - There can be question of suspecting that the BPCL did not include such rental income from the assessee in its return of income. It is, therefore, held that the case of the assessee is covered by second proviso to section 40(a)(ia) and hence the disallowance made cannot be sustained. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2022 11:12:12 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2022 11:12:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=672845" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Expenditure Disallowance Overturned Due to Non-Deduction of TDS; Assessee Wins u/s 40(a)(ia) Proviso.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=62429</link>
      <description>Disallowance of expenditure incurred on account of LFR - Non deduction of TDS - Disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) - There can be question of suspecting that the BPCL did not include such rental income from the assessee in its return of income. It is, therefore, held that the case of the assessee is covered by second proviso to section 40(a)(ia) and hence the disallowance made cannot be sustained. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2022 11:12:12 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=62429</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>