<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 580 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419542</link>
    <description>The ITAT dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to allow the assessee&#039;s claim of additional depreciation under section 32(1)(iia) of the Income Tax Act. The ITAT found that the assessee, engaged in retail gas distribution, met the criteria for claiming additional depreciation as a manufacturer, based on previous rulings and lack of distinguishing facts presented by the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2022 10:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=672839" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 580 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419542</link>
      <description>The ITAT dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to allow the assessee&#039;s claim of additional depreciation under section 32(1)(iia) of the Income Tax Act. The ITAT found that the assessee, engaged in retail gas distribution, met the criteria for claiming additional depreciation as a manufacturer, based on previous rulings and lack of distinguishing facts presented by the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419542</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>