<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 566 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419528</link>
    <description>A trust with identifiable beneficiaries and fixed shares from inception was treated as a determinate, non-discretionary revocable trust, because the deed preserved a real right of revocation. On those facts, the arrangement was not assessed as an Association of Persons merely because income passed through the trust. Applying the provisions governing revocable transfers, the income was held taxable in the hands of the contributors rather than in the hands of the trust.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2022 07:47:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=672815" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 566 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419528</link>
      <description>A trust with identifiable beneficiaries and fixed shares from inception was treated as a determinate, non-discretionary revocable trust, because the deed preserved a real right of revocation. On those facts, the arrangement was not assessed as an Association of Persons merely because income passed through the trust. Applying the provisions governing revocable transfers, the income was held taxable in the hands of the contributors rather than in the hands of the trust.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419528</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>