<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 555 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419517</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal but directed the appellant to return the collected amounts to the customers or deposit them in the Consumer Welfare Fund, emphasizing the principle of unjust enrichment and the constitutional mandate against unauthorized tax collection. Compliance report was to be furnished within 15 days after the two-month period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2022 10:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=672804" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 555 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419517</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal but directed the appellant to return the collected amounts to the customers or deposit them in the Consumer Welfare Fund, emphasizing the principle of unjust enrichment and the constitutional mandate against unauthorized tax collection. Compliance report was to be furnished within 15 days after the two-month period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419517</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>