https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419514 Recruitment Rules, 2016 were treated as a complete service regime for separate commissionerate cadres, so the earlier enabling provision for absorption across commissionerates could not be read back into the rules and inter-commissionerate absorption was not available as of right. Prior executive instructions could not override the rules framed under Article 309, and the 20 September 2018 circular was treated as a policy choice within the employer's domain rather than a legally enforceable entitlement for employees. The policy was also examined against equality, non-discrimination, dignity, reasonable accommodation, and family-life concerns, with recognition that special cases may require accommodation, but the blanket restriction was not invalidated on that basis. en-us Thu, 10 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 10 Mar 2022 15:30:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419514 Recruitment Rules, 2016 were treated as a complete service regime for separate commissionerate cadres, so the earlier enabling provision for absorption across commissionerates could not be read back into the rules and inter-commissionerate absorption was not available as of right. Prior executive instructions could not override the rules framed under Article 309, and the 20 September 2018 circular was treated as a policy choice within the employer's domain rather than a legally enforceable entitlement for employees. The policy was also examined against equality, non-discrimination, dignity, reasonable accommodation, and family-life concerns, with recognition that special cases may require accommodation, but the blanket restriction was not invalidated on that basis. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 10 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419514