https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301119 A plaint can be rejected under Order VII Rule 11(a) only if a meaningful reading of the pleadings discloses no cause of action; the Court does not weigh evidence or require documentary proof at that stage. Allegations of a pre-incorporation arrangement, later conduct consistent with it, and pleaded acts of interference, intimidation, fraud, collusion and conspiracy were treated as sufficient to disclose arguable contractual and tortious claims for trial. Rejection under Order VII Rule 11(d) is available only where a legal bar is apparent on the face of the plaint, and disputed questions about the agreement's existence, scope and enforceability did not establish such a bar. The plaint was allowed to proceed. en-us Mon, 18 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 14 Mar 2022 07:46:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301119 A plaint can be rejected under Order VII Rule 11(a) only if a meaningful reading of the pleadings discloses no cause of action; the Court does not weigh evidence or require documentary proof at that stage. Allegations of a pre-incorporation arrangement, later conduct consistent with it, and pleaded acts of interference, intimidation, fraud, collusion and conspiracy were treated as sufficient to disclose arguable contractual and tortious claims for trial. Rejection under Order VII Rule 11(d) is available only where a legal bar is apparent on the face of the plaint, and disputed questions about the agreement's existence, scope and enforceability did not establish such a bar. The plaint was allowed to proceed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 18 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301119