https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301124 Conflicting precedent on default bail under Section 167(2)(a)(ii) of the CrPC concerned whether the day of remand is included when computing the 60/90-day period. The order noted that prior decisions had taken divergent views on this computation issue, creating uncertainty in the law. Because authoritative clarification was required, the question was referred to a larger Bench for determination. en-us Tue, 23 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 14 Mar 2022 07:46:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301124 Conflicting precedent on default bail under Section 167(2)(a)(ii) of the CrPC concerned whether the day of remand is included when computing the 60/90-day period. The order noted that prior decisions had taken divergent views on this computation issue, creating uncertainty in the law. Because authoritative clarification was required, the question was referred to a larger Bench for determination. Case-Laws Money Laundering Tue, 23 Feb 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301124