<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (11) TMI 739 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301108</link>
    <description>The court found in favor of the respondent society in an eviction petition against the legal heirs of a deceased employee who continued to possess the premises illegally. The Appellate Rent Control Tribunal upheld the society&#039;s right to the premises, emphasizing the legal heirs had no right to continue possession after the employee&#039;s death. The court imposed costs of Rs. 15,10,000 on the petitioners for frivolous litigation and illegal possession, highlighting the need to deter such actions and uphold justice by holding wrongdoers accountable. The petitioners were directed to vacate the premises within 30 days.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Mar 2022 11:50:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=672761" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (11) TMI 739 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301108</link>
      <description>The court found in favor of the respondent society in an eviction petition against the legal heirs of a deceased employee who continued to possess the premises illegally. The Appellate Rent Control Tribunal upheld the society&#039;s right to the premises, emphasizing the legal heirs had no right to continue possession after the employee&#039;s death. The court imposed costs of Rs. 15,10,000 on the petitioners for frivolous litigation and illegal possession, highlighting the need to deter such actions and uphold justice by holding wrongdoers accountable. The petitioners were directed to vacate the premises within 30 days.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301108</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>