https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419507 The HC quashed impugned GST assessment orders for 2018-2019 to 2021-2022 that were challenged for non-compliance with Section 75(4) requirements. The petitioner claimed to have replied to show cause notices before expiry of 30 days, while respondent maintained no reply was received before orders were passed. The court found the petitioner attempted to reply only after orders were issued. Despite available alternative remedy under Section 107, the court conditionally quashed the orders, requiring petitioner to deposit Rs. 7.5 lakhs within 30 days. Upon deposit, respondents must pass fresh orders after granting a hearing within 60 days. If deposit isn't made, the original orders would automatically revive. en-us Thu, 03 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 01 Apr 2025 18:05:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419507 The HC quashed impugned GST assessment orders for 2018-2019 to 2021-2022 that were challenged for non-compliance with Section 75(4) requirements. The petitioner claimed to have replied to show cause notices before expiry of 30 days, while respondent maintained no reply was received before orders were passed. The court found the petitioner attempted to reply only after orders were issued. Despite available alternative remedy under Section 107, the court conditionally quashed the orders, requiring petitioner to deposit Rs. 7.5 lakhs within 30 days. Upon deposit, respondents must pass fresh orders after granting a hearing within 60 days. If deposit isn't made, the original orders would automatically revive. Case-Laws GST Thu, 03 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419507