<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 543 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419505</link>
    <description>Writ interference was declined where the assessment order and rectified assessment order were appealable, leaving the assessee to pursue the statutory appellate remedy. The Court also did not examine the challenge to provisional attachment of immovable property on merits because the attachment order had already outlived its statutory period and was no longer in operation. To enable use of the appellate remedy, the Court directed supply of a copy of the original assessment order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2025 12:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=672737" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 543 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419505</link>
      <description>Writ interference was declined where the assessment order and rectified assessment order were appealable, leaving the assessee to pursue the statutory appellate remedy. The Court also did not examine the challenge to provisional attachment of immovable property on merits because the attachment order had already outlived its statutory period and was no longer in operation. To enable use of the appellate remedy, the Court directed supply of a copy of the original assessment order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419505</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>