https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419489 The court ruled in favor of the writ applicant, directing the Revenue to release the seized gold jewelry weighing 524.500 grams. The petitioner, engaged in the business of Gold Jewelry, successfully argued that the seized jewelry was purchased from a specific entity and all transactions were properly recorded. As the Revenue did not challenge the appellate decision, the court found no basis for withholding the jewelry and granted relief to the petitioner. en-us Mon, 07 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 21 Nov 2022 12:54:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419489 The court ruled in favor of the writ applicant, directing the Revenue to release the seized gold jewelry weighing 524.500 grams. The petitioner, engaged in the business of Gold Jewelry, successfully argued that the seized jewelry was purchased from a specific entity and all transactions were properly recorded. As the Revenue did not challenge the appellate decision, the court found no basis for withholding the jewelry and granted relief to the petitioner. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 07 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419489