<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 519 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419481</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of prior period expenses paid to Suzlon Ltd. and professional consultancy expenses to M/s. V J Shroff and Co. The additional evidence admitted did not alter the decision. Emphasizing deductions for expenses incurred in the relevant year, the Tribunal clarified that the proviso to Section 40(a)(ia) did not apply as the expenses were from prior periods. The appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Mar 2022 12:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=672713" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 519 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419481</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of prior period expenses paid to Suzlon Ltd. and professional consultancy expenses to M/s. V J Shroff and Co. The additional evidence admitted did not alter the decision. Emphasizing deductions for expenses incurred in the relevant year, the Tribunal clarified that the proviso to Section 40(a)(ia) did not apply as the expenses were from prior periods. The appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419481</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>