<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 516 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419478</link>
    <description>The court allowed the writ petitions, directing the respondents to issue licenses to the petitioners as Custom Brokers. It held that the petitioners should be assessed based on the 50 marks criteria as initially set out, emphasizing that changing the criteria midway without notice was impermissible. The court found that the retrospective application of CBLR, 2018 was not justified in this case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Mar 2022 08:06:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=672710" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 516 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419478</link>
      <description>The court allowed the writ petitions, directing the respondents to issue licenses to the petitioners as Custom Brokers. It held that the petitioners should be assessed based on the 50 marks criteria as initially set out, emphasizing that changing the criteria midway without notice was impermissible. The court found that the retrospective application of CBLR, 2018 was not justified in this case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419478</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>