<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 504 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419466</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the order of the Additional Commissioner. All demands, interest, and penalties based on the invalidated Rule 8(3A) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 were nullified, following precedents from various High Courts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Mar 2022 08:05:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=672698" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 504 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419466</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the order of the Additional Commissioner. All demands, interest, and penalties based on the invalidated Rule 8(3A) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 were nullified, following precedents from various High Courts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419466</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>