https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419465 The Tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the order dated 31.01.2018. It found that the allegations of clandestine activities were not substantiated by sufficient evidence. The confiscation of goods and currency was deemed unjustified, and penalties imposed under Rule 26 were set aside due to lack of corroborative evidence. The Tribunal stressed the importance of concrete evidence in proving charges of clandestine activities. en-us Tue, 08 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 12 Mar 2022 08:05:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419465 The Tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the order dated 31.01.2018. It found that the allegations of clandestine activities were not substantiated by sufficient evidence. The confiscation of goods and currency was deemed unjustified, and penalties imposed under Rule 26 were set aside due to lack of corroborative evidence. The Tribunal stressed the importance of concrete evidence in proving charges of clandestine activities. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 08 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419465