<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 1787 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301090</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the laying of Telecom Cables under or alongside roads for Telecom Companies was not subject to service tax as per the CBEC Circular. The appellant&#039;s appeal was allowed, and the demand for service tax, interest, and penalties was set aside. The judgment emphasized the non-taxable nature of the service based on the circular, providing relief to the appellant and establishing the legality of their actions in this case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Mar 2022 08:05:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=672688" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 1787 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301090</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the laying of Telecom Cables under or alongside roads for Telecom Companies was not subject to service tax as per the CBEC Circular. The appellant&#039;s appeal was allowed, and the demand for service tax, interest, and penalties was set aside. The judgment emphasized the non-taxable nature of the service based on the circular, providing relief to the appellant and establishing the legality of their actions in this case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301090</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>