<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (6) TMI 798 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301100</link>
    <description>The court disposed of all writ petitions challenging a provisional attachment order under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. The petitioners were allowed to operate their bank accounts subject to maintaining the balance of the attached amount. They were also granted liberty to challenge another provisional attachment order. All writ petitions and pending applications were disposed of, and interim orders were vacated.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Mar 2022 08:05:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=672686" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (6) TMI 798 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301100</link>
      <description>The court disposed of all writ petitions challenging a provisional attachment order under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. The petitioners were allowed to operate their bank accounts subject to maintaining the balance of the attached amount. They were also granted liberty to challenge another provisional attachment order. All writ petitions and pending applications were disposed of, and interim orders were vacated.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301100</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>