https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301104 Summary explains that summary eviction under the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971 is not appropriate where the occupant raises a bona fide and long-standing dispute over title and ownership; such rival claims require civil adjudication, so a notice under Section 4 cannot stand on summary proceedings alone. It also notes that the doctrine of merger does not apply where an earlier Supreme Court disposal was not on the merits of the title dispute and merely left parties to work out their remedies in accordance with law. On that basis, the impugned notice was quashed and the challenge was allowed. en-us Fri, 15 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 12 Mar 2022 08:05:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301104 Summary explains that summary eviction under the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971 is not appropriate where the occupant raises a bona fide and long-standing dispute over title and ownership; such rival claims require civil adjudication, so a notice under Section 4 cannot stand on summary proceedings alone. It also notes that the doctrine of merger does not apply where an earlier Supreme Court disposal was not on the merits of the title dispute and merely left parties to work out their remedies in accordance with law. On that basis, the impugned notice was quashed and the challenge was allowed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 15 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301104