https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301103 Default bail under Section 167(2) CrPC was unavailable because the charge-sheet was filed within the prescribed ninety-day period. The computation excluded the day of remand to judicial custody and included the day of filing, placing the charge-sheet on the ninetieth day. Since the statutory right to release on bail arises only after expiry of the prescribed period without filing of the charge-sheet, that precondition was not met. The refusal of bail was therefore legally valid and consistent with the statutory scheme. en-us Fri, 20 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 12 Mar 2022 08:05:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301103 Default bail under Section 167(2) CrPC was unavailable because the charge-sheet was filed within the prescribed ninety-day period. The computation excluded the day of remand to judicial custody and included the day of filing, placing the charge-sheet on the ninetieth day. Since the statutory right to release on bail arises only after expiry of the prescribed period without filing of the charge-sheet, that precondition was not met. The refusal of bail was therefore legally valid and consistent with the statutory scheme. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 20 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301103