<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1969 (9) TMI 129 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301085</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court clarified that an order rejecting a petition for redemption by the Assistant Collector under the Redemption of Mortgages (Punjab) Act 2 of 1913 does not prevent a subsequent suit for redemption. The Court held that such an order does not impact the mortgagor&#039;s right to seek relief through a civil court. The decision affirmed the redemption of the mortgage in favor of the plaintiffs, emphasizing that the Assistant Collector&#039;s decision did not necessitate a suit under Section 12 of the Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 1969 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2022 14:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=672642" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1969 (9) TMI 129 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301085</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court clarified that an order rejecting a petition for redemption by the Assistant Collector under the Redemption of Mortgages (Punjab) Act 2 of 1913 does not prevent a subsequent suit for redemption. The Court held that such an order does not impact the mortgagor&#039;s right to seek relief through a civil court. The decision affirmed the redemption of the mortgage in favor of the plaintiffs, emphasizing that the Assistant Collector&#039;s decision did not necessitate a suit under Section 12 of the Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 1969 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301085</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>