https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301085 A Collector's refusal to grant summary redemption under the Punjab Redemption of Mortgages Act, 1913, and direction to pursue the matter in civil court did not, by itself, extinguish the mortgagor's redemption claim. The order did not decide any adverse right on the merits and merely reflected that complicated questions of fact and law required ordinary adjudication. Article 14 of the Limitation Act, 1908, applied only to suits seeking to set aside a qualifying governmental order, and Section 12 did not create a bar where the Collector had not conclusively determined the redemption right. The civil suit for redemption was therefore within limitation. en-us Mon, 15 Sep 1969 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 11 Mar 2022 14:09:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301085 A Collector's refusal to grant summary redemption under the Punjab Redemption of Mortgages Act, 1913, and direction to pursue the matter in civil court did not, by itself, extinguish the mortgagor's redemption claim. The order did not decide any adverse right on the merits and merely reflected that complicated questions of fact and law required ordinary adjudication. Article 14 of the Limitation Act, 1908, applied only to suits seeking to set aside a qualifying governmental order, and Section 12 did not create a bar where the Collector had not conclusively determined the redemption right. The civil suit for redemption was therefore within limitation. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 15 Sep 1969 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301085