<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 492 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419454</link>
    <description>HC held that under Section 75(4) CGST/UPGST Act, 2017, grant of personal hearing is mandatory whenever an adverse decision is contemplated, even without a specific request from the assessee. The authority&#039;s failure to afford such hearing before passing the adjudication order under Section 74 constituted a violation of principles of natural justice. Exercising writ jurisdiction under Article 226 despite availability of alternative remedy, HC quashed the impugned order for the relevant tax period (April 2019-20). The writ petition filed by the assessee was allowed to the aforesaid extent, with costs of Rs. 10,000 imposed on the revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2025 14:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=672623" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 492 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419454</link>
      <description>HC held that under Section 75(4) CGST/UPGST Act, 2017, grant of personal hearing is mandatory whenever an adverse decision is contemplated, even without a specific request from the assessee. The authority&#039;s failure to afford such hearing before passing the adjudication order under Section 74 constituted a violation of principles of natural justice. Exercising writ jurisdiction under Article 226 despite availability of alternative remedy, HC quashed the impugned order for the relevant tax period (April 2019-20). The writ petition filed by the assessee was allowed to the aforesaid extent, with costs of Rs. 10,000 imposed on the revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419454</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>