<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 491 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419453</link>
    <description>The HC quashed the order dated 27.11.2021 under Section 73(9) of CGST/UPGST Act, 2017 due to violation of natural justice principles. The petitioner was not granted reasonable time to respond to the show cause notice initially issued undated but later marked as 20.10.2021. The matter was remitted to respondent No.3 to pass a fresh order within two months, with petitioner directed to submit a reply within three weeks. The court emphasized the importance of procedural fairness and right to be heard in tax proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2025 18:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=672622" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 491 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419453</link>
      <description>The HC quashed the order dated 27.11.2021 under Section 73(9) of CGST/UPGST Act, 2017 due to violation of natural justice principles. The petitioner was not granted reasonable time to respond to the show cause notice initially issued undated but later marked as 20.10.2021. The matter was remitted to respondent No.3 to pass a fresh order within two months, with petitioner directed to submit a reply within three weeks. The court emphasized the importance of procedural fairness and right to be heard in tax proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419453</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>