https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419453 An order passed under section 73(9) was found unsustainable because it followed an undated notice under section 73(1) and the petitioner had not been given reasonable time to file a reply. The court noted that the request for adjournment had not been disbelieved and, in light of the earlier direction for independent consideration of objections, the authority was required to afford a fair opportunity before adjudication. Failure to comply with the principles of natural justice rendered the order liable to be quashed, and the matter was remitted for fresh adjudication after considering the petitioner's reply. en-us Thu, 03 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 01 Apr 2025 18:06:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419453 An order passed under section 73(9) was found unsustainable because it followed an undated notice under section 73(1) and the petitioner had not been given reasonable time to file a reply. The court noted that the request for adjournment had not been disbelieved and, in light of the earlier direction for independent consideration of objections, the authority was required to afford a fair opportunity before adjudication. Failure to comply with the principles of natural justice rendered the order liable to be quashed, and the matter was remitted for fresh adjudication after considering the petitioner's reply. Case-Laws GST Thu, 03 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419453