<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 481 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419443</link>
    <description>The court quashed the show cause notice and order, ruling that the petitioner was not liable to deduct tax at source under Section 195 of the Income Tax Act, as it did not make any payment to the non-resident entity. The court held that respondent no.1 lacked jurisdiction to treat the petitioner as an assessee in default under Section 201 of the Act. Consequently, the petition was allowed, and the impugned notice and order were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 26 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2022 18:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=672612" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 481 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419443</link>
      <description>The court quashed the show cause notice and order, ruling that the petitioner was not liable to deduct tax at source under Section 195 of the Income Tax Act, as it did not make any payment to the non-resident entity. The court held that respondent no.1 lacked jurisdiction to treat the petitioner as an assessee in default under Section 201 of the Act. Consequently, the petition was allowed, and the impugned notice and order were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 26 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419443</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>