<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 474 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419436</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, determining that the long-term capital gain of Rs. 37,78,270/- was properly declared in AY 2008-09 and could not be taxed in AY 2014-15. The Tribunal found the evidence presented by the assessee to be credible, supporting the authenticity of the transactions, while the Revenue failed to counter with contradictory evidence. Consequently, the addition made by the AO and upheld by the CIT(A) was not upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2022 08:00:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=672605" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 474 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419436</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, determining that the long-term capital gain of Rs. 37,78,270/- was properly declared in AY 2008-09 and could not be taxed in AY 2014-15. The Tribunal found the evidence presented by the assessee to be credible, supporting the authenticity of the transactions, while the Revenue failed to counter with contradictory evidence. Consequently, the addition made by the AO and upheld by the CIT(A) was not upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419436</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>