<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (10) TMI 1307 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH, COURT-II</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301081</link>
    <description>The Tribunal admitted the petition under Section 7 of the IBC, initiating CIRP against the Corporate Debtor. It ordered a moratorium under Section 14 of the IBC, appointed an Interim Resolution Professional (IRP), and directed the Financial Creditor to deposit Rs. 2,00,000/- for CIRP expenses. The Tribunal emphasized that the debt and default were clearly established, and there was no valid reason to deny the petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2022 07:58:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=672578" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (10) TMI 1307 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH, COURT-II</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301081</link>
      <description>The Tribunal admitted the petition under Section 7 of the IBC, initiating CIRP against the Corporate Debtor. It ordered a moratorium under Section 14 of the IBC, appointed an Interim Resolution Professional (IRP), and directed the Financial Creditor to deposit Rs. 2,00,000/- for CIRP expenses. The Tribunal emphasized that the debt and default were clearly established, and there was no valid reason to deny the petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301081</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>