https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301077 The court held the suit maintainable, recognizing a distinct cause of action in tortious interference by Amazon. It validated the Emergency Arbitrator's legal status under the A&C Act, finding no conflict with public policy. The resolution of FRL was deemed prima facie valid, with no statutory violations. Amazon's rights under the agreements were found to constitute control over FRL, conflicting with FEMA FDI Rules due to lack of government approvals. A prima facie case of tortious interference by Amazon was established. However, the court declined to grant an interim injunction, directing statutory authorities to resolve the matter according to law. en-us Mon, 21 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 11 Mar 2022 07:58:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301077 The court held the suit maintainable, recognizing a distinct cause of action in tortious interference by Amazon. It validated the Emergency Arbitrator's legal status under the A&C Act, finding no conflict with public policy. The resolution of FRL was deemed prima facie valid, with no statutory violations. Amazon's rights under the agreements were found to constitute control over FRL, conflicting with FEMA FDI Rules due to lack of government approvals. A prima facie case of tortious interference by Amazon was established. However, the court declined to grant an interim injunction, directing statutory authorities to resolve the matter according to law. Case-Laws Law of Competition Mon, 21 Dec 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301077