<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (5) TMI 1127 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301065</link>
    <description>The ITAT Mumbai dismissed all appeals of the assessee for assessment years 2001-02 to 2007-08 due to non-appearance and lack of prosecution. Despite multiple notices, the assessee showed no interest in prosecuting the appeals, leading to their dismissal in line with precedents allowing courts or tribunals to dismiss appeals when a party fails to prosecute proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2022 17:16:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=672546" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (5) TMI 1127 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301065</link>
      <description>The ITAT Mumbai dismissed all appeals of the assessee for assessment years 2001-02 to 2007-08 due to non-appearance and lack of prosecution. Despite multiple notices, the assessee showed no interest in prosecuting the appeals, leading to their dismissal in line with precedents allowing courts or tribunals to dismiss appeals when a party fails to prosecute proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301065</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>