<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (12) TMI 7 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28253</link>
    <description>Dividend relief under section 236 was available where a transferee bank, after amalgamation and name change, distributed dividends from reserves traced to profits already taxed for periods ending before 1 April 1960. The amalgamation did not extinguish the transferee bank, so the earlier taxed profits could be followed into the reserve and treated as the source of the dividend; the word &quot;actually&quot; did not prevent such tracing. An order refusing this relief was also appealable under section 246(n) because the relief was, in substance, a refund of tax already paid. The assessee&#039;s entitlement and the maintainability of the appeal were both upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 10:29:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=67251" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (12) TMI 7 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28253</link>
      <description>Dividend relief under section 236 was available where a transferee bank, after amalgamation and name change, distributed dividends from reserves traced to profits already taxed for periods ending before 1 April 1960. The amalgamation did not extinguish the transferee bank, so the earlier taxed profits could be followed into the reserve and treated as the source of the dividend; the word &quot;actually&quot; did not prevent such tracing. An order refusing this relief was also appealable under section 246(n) because the relief was, in substance, a refund of tax already paid. The assessee&#039;s entitlement and the maintainability of the appeal were both upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28253</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>