<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 423 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419385</link>
    <description>The ITAT quashed the order of the Ld. PCIT, holding that the revisionary jurisdiction under section 263 was invalidly exercised as the AO had thoroughly examined the relevant issues. The ITAT found no error or prejudice in the AO&#039;s order, leading to the allowance of the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2022 08:18:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=672496" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 423 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419385</link>
      <description>The ITAT quashed the order of the Ld. PCIT, holding that the revisionary jurisdiction under section 263 was invalidly exercised as the AO had thoroughly examined the relevant issues. The ITAT found no error or prejudice in the AO&#039;s order, leading to the allowance of the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419385</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>