<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 420 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419382</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the learned single Judge&#039;s decision to set aside Anti-Dumping Duty demands for specific periods due to the extension of the notification period. The Court affirmed the High Court&#039;s interpretation and dismissed the writ appeal challenging the order in W.P. No. 22770 of 2017, with no costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2022 08:18:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=672493" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 420 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419382</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the learned single Judge&#039;s decision to set aside Anti-Dumping Duty demands for specific periods due to the extension of the notification period. The Court affirmed the High Court&#039;s interpretation and dismissed the writ appeal challenging the order in W.P. No. 22770 of 2017, with no costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419382</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>