https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301041 Under Section 309(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code, a Magistrate or trial court may, as an incidental procedural power exercised judicially and for good reasons, stay the operation of its own bail order for a reasonable period or defer its effectiveness to a future date. The Court rejected the view that such power exists only in the High Court or Supreme Court, distinguishing cases on review, recall, cancellation of bail, and restoration of proceedings. It also held that a later bail application should ordinarily have been placed before the same Metropolitan Magistrate who had earlier passed a reasoned order, and the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate's intervention was improper. en-us Wed, 22 Sep 1993 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 09 Mar 2022 14:08:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301041 Under Section 309(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code, a Magistrate or trial court may, as an incidental procedural power exercised judicially and for good reasons, stay the operation of its own bail order for a reasonable period or defer its effectiveness to a future date. The Court rejected the view that such power exists only in the High Court or Supreme Court, distinguishing cases on review, recall, cancellation of bail, and restoration of proceedings. It also held that a later bail application should ordinarily have been placed before the same Metropolitan Magistrate who had earlier passed a reasoned order, and the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate's intervention was improper. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 22 Sep 1993 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301041