<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (2) TMI 1605 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301040</link>
    <description>The SC modified an interim order governing recovery of a disputed tax demand pending final disposal of the appeal. The department was allowed to continue raising demands so that limitation would not operate, the appellants were required to keep paying the admitted demand, and the disputed balance was to remain in an escrow account. Coercive recovery of the differential amount was barred unless leave of the Court was obtained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2022 12:11:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=672421" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (2) TMI 1605 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301040</link>
      <description>The SC modified an interim order governing recovery of a disputed tax demand pending final disposal of the appeal. The department was allowed to continue raising demands so that limitation would not operate, the appellants were required to keep paying the admitted demand, and the disputed balance was to remain in an escrow account. Coercive recovery of the differential amount was barred unless leave of the Court was obtained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=301040</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>