<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 395 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419357</link>
    <description>Challenge to a statutory notice became infructuous after the tax demand was satisfied and the notice was withdrawn, so the Court treated the dispute over that notice as no longer surviving and did not examine its validity. The constitutional challenge to Section 16(2)(c) of the CGST Act and Rule 86A of the CGST Rules was also left undecided, because identical issues were already pending before other High Courts. The petition was therefore disposed of without adjudicating the constitutional validity of those provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2025 12:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=672408" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 395 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419357</link>
      <description>Challenge to a statutory notice became infructuous after the tax demand was satisfied and the notice was withdrawn, so the Court treated the dispute over that notice as no longer surviving and did not examine its validity. The constitutional challenge to Section 16(2)(c) of the CGST Act and Rule 86A of the CGST Rules was also left undecided, because identical issues were already pending before other High Courts. The petition was therefore disposed of without adjudicating the constitutional validity of those provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419357</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>