https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419354 The court granted bail to the accused who faced allegations of involvement in fraudulent Input Tax Credit schemes worth Rs. 72 crores through multiple shell companies. Despite prosecution evidence from WhatsApp chats and statements under the GST Act, the court determined that continued custody served no purpose, especially as co-accused with direct involvement had already received bail. The DC imposed conditions including a Rs. 5,00,000 personal bond, requirements to cooperate with investigation, not influence witnesses or tamper with evidence, and restrictions on leaving the country. The decision applied established bail principles from precedents like Anil Mahajan and Dipak Subhash Chandra Mehta cases. en-us Sat, 05 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 01 Apr 2025 18:02:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419354 The court granted bail to the accused who faced allegations of involvement in fraudulent Input Tax Credit schemes worth Rs. 72 crores through multiple shell companies. Despite prosecution evidence from WhatsApp chats and statements under the GST Act, the court determined that continued custody served no purpose, especially as co-accused with direct involvement had already received bail. The DC imposed conditions including a Rs. 5,00,000 personal bond, requirements to cooperate with investigation, not influence witnesses or tamper with evidence, and restrictions on leaving the country. The decision applied established bail principles from precedents like Anil Mahajan and Dipak Subhash Chandra Mehta cases. Case-Laws GST Sat, 05 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419354