<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 390 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419352</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the disallowance of the electricity duty payment under Section 43B, ruling that the deposit in a no-lien/escrow account did not meet the requirement of &quot;actual payment.&quot; Additionally, the disallowance of 20% of foreign travel expenditure was affirmed due to insufficient evidence proving the expenses were solely for business purposes. The appeal was dismissed in favor of the Department on both issues, with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2022 13:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=672403" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 390 - ORISSA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419352</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the disallowance of the electricity duty payment under Section 43B, ruling that the deposit in a no-lien/escrow account did not meet the requirement of &quot;actual payment.&quot; Additionally, the disallowance of 20% of foreign travel expenditure was affirmed due to insufficient evidence proving the expenses were solely for business purposes. The appeal was dismissed in favor of the Department on both issues, with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419352</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>