https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419348 The Court dismissed the petitioner's challenge under Article 226, emphasizing that the 20% payment directive was for stay under Section 220(6) of the Income Tax Act, not a pre-deposit for appeal under Section 246A. The petitioner was permitted to file an application for stay of the remaining 80% of the demand based on the Cooperative Society's financial condition. The writ petition was dismissed without costs, allowing for further action under Section 220(6). en-us Thu, 24 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 09 Mar 2022 08:30:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419348 The Court dismissed the petitioner's challenge under Article 226, emphasizing that the 20% payment directive was for stay under Section 220(6) of the Income Tax Act, not a pre-deposit for appeal under Section 246A. The petitioner was permitted to file an application for stay of the remaining 80% of the demand based on the Cooperative Society's financial condition. The writ petition was dismissed without costs, allowing for further action under Section 220(6). Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 24 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419348