https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419328 Provisions on oppression and mismanagement under the Companies Act, 2013 were treated as inapplicable to allegations that directors were inducted through a forged Form No. 32, because the complaint concerned forged corporate filings rather than the statutory remedy for oppression. The Court also applied the settled principle that inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC must be used sparingly and not to test evidence at the threshold where the charge sheet and supporting material disclose a prima facie offence. On that basis, the request to quash the criminal proceedings was declined and the prosecution was allowed to continue. en-us Fri, 04 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 09 Mar 2022 11:37:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419328 Provisions on oppression and mismanagement under the Companies Act, 2013 were treated as inapplicable to allegations that directors were inducted through a forged Form No. 32, because the complaint concerned forged corporate filings rather than the statutory remedy for oppression. The Court also applied the settled principle that inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC must be used sparingly and not to test evidence at the threshold where the charge sheet and supporting material disclose a prima facie offence. On that basis, the request to quash the criminal proceedings was declined and the prosecution was allowed to continue. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 04 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419328