<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 357 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419319</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, finding the refund claim not time-barred as it was initially filed within the time limit but returned erroneously by the Assistant Commissioner of Service Tax. The Tribunal held that the delay in refiling the claim before the correct authority should not render it time-barred, remanding the matter for a review on its merits by the adjudicating authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2022 08:28:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=672370" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 357 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419319</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, finding the refund claim not time-barred as it was initially filed within the time limit but returned erroneously by the Assistant Commissioner of Service Tax. The Tribunal held that the delay in refiling the claim before the correct authority should not render it time-barred, remanding the matter for a review on its merits by the adjudicating authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419319</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>