<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 356 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419318</link>
    <description>Section 34(8A) of the Gujarat Value Added Tax Act, 2003 applies only when proceedings under the Act are already pending, and a reassessment notice founded solely on audit objections without any pending proceeding lacks jurisdiction. As no proceeding was pending and the authority relied only on audit objections, the jurisdictional precondition for reopening was absent and the notice was quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2022 08:28:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=672369" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 356 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419318</link>
      <description>Section 34(8A) of the Gujarat Value Added Tax Act, 2003 applies only when proceedings under the Act are already pending, and a reassessment notice founded solely on audit objections without any pending proceeding lacks jurisdiction. As no proceeding was pending and the authority relied only on audit objections, the jurisdictional precondition for reopening was absent and the notice was quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419318</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>